Bennett’s Opponent Either Violates or Ignores Campaign Election Disclosure Law. Either is NOT Good

Bo Bennett, Candidate for Knox County Commission Seventh District has an opponent. The opponent has failed to print a disclosure on his campaign yard signs. The disclosure should state who purchased the signs. For example, Bennett’s disclosure says Paid for by Bo Bennett for Knox County – John Van Dyke Treasurer. Here is the link from the Knox County Election Commission that links to the state website with the state law governing all political material including yard signs. Elmer Henderlight reminds me through emails that some people don’t like clicking on links. So, below is the verbiage from the governing law.

TCA 2-19-120. Political communications, advertising and solicitations — Contents — Applicability — Penalties.

(a) Whenever any person makes an expenditure for the purpose of financing a communication that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, as defined by § 2-10-102, or that solicits any contribution, through any broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine, outdoor advertising facility, poster, yard sign, direct mailing or any other form of general public political advertising, a disclaimer meeting the requirements of subdivision (a)(1), (2), (3) or (4) shall appear and be presented in a clear and conspicuous manner to give the reader, observer or listener adequate notice of the identity of persons who paid for and, where required, who authorized the communication. Such person is not required to place the disclaimer on the front face or page of any such material, as long as a disclaimer appears within the communication, except on communications, such as billboards, that contain only a front face.

(1) Such communication, including any solicitation, if paid for and authorized by a candidate, an authorized committee of a candidate, or its agent shall clearly state that the communication has been paid for by the authorized political committee, in addition to the identity of the person who is the head of such committee, or the identity of the treasurer of such committee.

(2) Such communication, including any solicitation, if authorized by a candidate, an authorized committee of a candidate or an agent thereof, but paid for by any other person, shall clearly state that the communication is paid for by such other person and is authorized by such candidate, authorized committee or agent.

(3) Such communication, including any solicitation, if made on behalf of or in opposition to a candidate, but paid for by any other person and not authorized by a candidate, authorized committee of a candidate or its agent, shall clearly state that the communication has been paid for by such person and is not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

(4) (A) For solicitations directed to the general public on behalf of a political committee which is not an authorized committee of a candidate, such solicitation shall clearly state the full name of the person who paid for the communication.

(B) For purposes of this section, whenever a separate segregated fund solicits contributions to the fund from those persons it may solicit, such communication shall not be considered a form of general public advertising. Such advertisements shall also include the name of the printer of such advertisement, and the identity of the person who paid for the advertisement.


Click for more details.


You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. Prazier says:

    If this is so, then who pays for the ads on your blog site

  2. BHornback says:

    Some ads are paid by candidates, candidate committees, supporters of candidates and some may be in kind advertisements. State law doesn’t stipulate web site ads. Thanks